Fractional operator, consultant or full-time hire: how to choose
The three options solve different problems. Picking the wrong one is expensive—in cash, in time and in the credibility you spend with your team.
When growth stalls, the instinct is to hire. Sometimes that is right. Often it is the slowest and riskiest of the three routes available to you.
Use a consultant when the question is 'what should we do?'
Consultants are strong where the problem is analytical and bounded: sizing a market, pricing, positioning, diligence. You get a considered answer and a document. What you do not get is anyone accountable for the result.
Use a fractional operator when the question is 'who will do it?'
This is the gap most scaleups actually sit in. The strategy is roughly known; what is missing is a senior pair of hands to own execution—running the partner conversations, sitting in the pipeline reviews, closing the first deals and building the process while doing it.
It works because the cost is a fraction of a full-time commercial leader, the person is proven in your market, and the engagement is scoped to an outcome rather than a headcount.
Hire full-time when the motion is repeatable
Once you know who buys, why they buy and what it costs to acquire them, hire. A permanent leader joining a defined motion succeeds far more often than one hired to invent it.
A simple test
Ask whether you could write the first 90 days of the role as a set of outcomes rather than responsibilities. If you can, hire. If you cannot, you need an operator to create those outcomes first.
Working on this right now?
Tell us where growth is getting stuck and we will come back with how we would scope it.
Start the conversation